Tag Archives: Real estate

Empty Offices Hurting NYC Budget

Nearly a quarter of all New York City office space is vacant. Now, the pain is spreading to the city’s budget.

From a report out this morning in Bloomberg:

The atrium at 60 Wall Street was once a thoroughfare for thousands of Deutsche Bank AG employees. 

These days it’s eerily quiet even during rush hour on a weekday morning. The occasional pedestrian crosses between Pine Street and Wall Street, the cavernous space utilized as a subway exit or a place to nap at one of the unused bistro tables.

The 47-story skyscraper, owned by Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund and Paramount Group, has sat empty since 2021, when Deutsche Bank — its only tenant — relocated to Columbus Circle.

Those skyscrapers pay a lot of taxes. But with vacancies everywhere, tax revenue is coming up short:

It’s a worry for city officials, who for the last decade have relied on an ever-expanding commercial real estate sector for taxes to pay for schools, cops and trash collection. Commercial property taxes contribute about 20% of the city’s total tax revenue — with office buildings, specifically, contributing 10%. And as those revenues are flattening, the city’s expenses are forecast to keep growing, creating challenges for Mayor Eric Adams’s agenda.

NYC’s current office vacancy rate is 22.7%. For decades, it never reached half that level.

But COVID, remote work, and safety concerns are keeping employees home.

If companies aren’t using their whole space, they will downsize or close their offices entirely when the lease is up. Some companies are skipping out on rent altogether.

That makes it harder for landlords to pay taxes. It could also reduce the assessed value of buildings, cutting tax payments for many years.

Meanwhile, landlords are stuck with these bad assets. There are no buyers for vacant office space in NYC at any price, according to a broker friend of mine.

But NYC can help get people back in offices and the taxes flowing. It starts with safety.

When crime makes people afraid to go to work, they’ll pressure their managers to work remote. In a strong labor market, managers will acquiesce.

After all, the CEO probably lives nearby and rides to work in a livery car. But the average employee endures a long subway commute that has now become dangerous.

NYC has to start by cleaning up the streets and making the subway safe. When people feel secure, many will want to come into the office and see their co-workers.

The city and state must also make it easier to convert office space to other uses.

New York does have some advantages. It’s safer than SF and has a more traditional industry mix.

The banks that dominate NYC want their people back in person.

Personally, I prefer remote work with the occasional get-together.

But if people feel safe, many offices will fill up again. And the city coffers will too.

What do you think the future holds for empty offices? Leave a comment and let us know!

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

More on markets:

‘There’s a Lot of Agony Out There’: Munger on CRE

Druck on the Coming Debt Crisis

The AI Gold Rush

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Advertisement

‘There’s a Lot of Agony Out There’: Munger on CRE

“A lot of real estate isn’t so good any more,” Munger said. “We have a lot of troubled office buildings, a lot of troubled shopping centres, a lot of troubled other properties. There’s a lot of agony out there.”

Berkshire Hathaway Vice Chairman Charles Munger has truly seen it all. At age 99, he’s an astute observer of markets and remains Warren Buffett’s right hand man.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


So when he sat down for a rare interview with the Financial Times this weekend, I couldn’t miss it.

Munger notes that many US banks are holding bad loans on commercial property. Those properties are declining in value due to higher vacancies and interest rates.

Loans for commercial real estate aren’t like residential mortgages. Instead of being fixed for 30 years, they usually must be refinanced every 5-10 years.

Banks are increasingly wary of CRE loans. From the Munger interview:

He noted that banks were already pulling back from lending to commercial developers. “Every bank in the country is way tighter on real estate loans today than they were six months ago,” he said. “They all seem [to be] too much trouble.”

If the refinancing happens at all, it will be at a much higher rate. If the owner can’t pay the new, higher payments, he may default.

That leaves the bank holding the bag.

And if the owner tries to sell, he faces a tough market.

Sales of office space are down 66% in the past year. There are no buyers at any price for vacant office space in NYC, according to a broker friend of mine.

Berkshire is staying away from this tough market. So is little old Francis — my real estate investments are in higher end apartments and fulfillment centers.

What’s the future for CRE? Leave a comment and let us know what you think!

This is the last blog for this week. I’m heading down to Kentucky tomorrow to visit my grandma!

See you on Monday, May 8th!

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

More on markets:

From $10 Billion to Zero — Late Stage Ice Age

Interest Rate Time Bomb May Kill Hedge Funds

To Riyadh, Hat in Hand

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Big Problems at Divvy Homes

Divvy Homes was supposed to help people achieve the American Dream. But some are only finding a nightmare.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


In a major investigation published this morning, Fast Company details widespread problems at the hot proptech startup.

Divvy Homes buys the house you want and rents it to you. When you’re ready, you can buy the house from Divvy.

This means Divvy is a huge landlord. And it’s struggling to service all those tenants.

Amber Gutierrez of San Antonio moved into the house of her dreams with Divvy’s help. But when problems surfaced, Divvy was nowhere to be found:

Gutierrez first reported a maintenance issue to Divvy in late January. The temperature in the home was hovering in the 50s, and her children were having trouble sleeping. She asked Divvy—legally, her landlord—to send someone to take a look at the heating system. But more than two weeks later, following an HVAC technician’s perfunctory visit, her children were still shivering through the night.

Soon, more problems appeared:

When the front porch and back deck started cracking and shifting, suggesting a foundation problem, she felt even more certain that they would have to leave, despite the prospect of having to pay a $4,400 surrender fee…

Any massive landlord is going to have times when maintenance falls short. This is especially true for a startup scaling at warp speed.

Divvy should incentivize its people to give customers great service. Customers should review their home and maintenance staff just like I review Uber drivers.

Good reviews should be a must for raises and promotions. And any employee with a pattern of bad reviews should be fired.

On the bright side, Gutierrez was able to find out about the foundation problems before buying the house. Had she bought it right away, those problems would’ve been hers to fix.

Divvy’s business model is messy. It involves a massive amount of logistics that a platform like Uber or a SaaS company like Salesforce simply doesn’t have.

Divvy also has huge reputational risks.

It rents to poorer households. This means Divvy can easily be painted as a slumlord when maintenance falls short.

Despite these issues, I think Divvy’s business model is a winner. Lots of people want to move into their dream home before they can afford it.

Divvy can buy it for them and rent it to them until they’re ready to buy. There’s a huge market for this, and the transaction size is massive.

But Divvy has to nail down its logistics. It must also make sure employees have the right incentives.

If your customers aren’t happy, nothing else matters.

Do you think Divvy helps aspiring homeowners, or hurts them? And why?

Leave a comment at the bottom and let me know!

More on tech:

Russian Engineers Are Fleeing the Country

How I Source Deals

Bridge Rounds: Yea or Nay?

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Photo: Divvy co-founder Adena Hefets

Adam Neumann Was Their Biggest Investor — Now He’s Their Biggest Competitor

It didn’t take long for Adam Neumann to find controversy. Before starting his new residential real estate startup Flow, Neumann made a big investment in a company that’s suspiciously similar.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


From an excellent report out yesterday in Forbes:

When staff at real estate startup Alfred arrived at work last Monday morning, they were surprised to discover that their largest investor, former WeWork CEO Adam Neumann, appeared to have started a rival company — and raised $350 million to compete against them.

Flow, Neumann’s splashy but mysterious new real estate venture, was aiming to build “the future of living,” influential venture capitalist Marc Andreessen wrote in a blog post announcing the investment. Alfred’s motto — “welcome to the future of living” — sounded uncomfortably similar.

Neumann is still a major investor, though he has stepped back from the board.

Neumann had wanted to acquire Alfred, but the terms of a new funding round blocked it. He appears to have set up Flow as a response.

Investors in startups are not supposed to back competing companies.

An investor is privy to tons of confidential information about a startup. Were that information disclosed to a competitor, even accidentally, it could cause serious damage.

Starting a competing company rarely comes up, but should be out of bounds for the same reasons.

Flow already appears to be cannibalizing Alfred’s business:

Alfred may have already started seeing the effects of Neumann’s influence. One of the Norwalk, Connecticut, apartments where Alfred participated in the experiment with Greystar had been featured on Alfred’s site as an example of how it works with landlords. But when a Forbes reporter stopped by to speak to residents, one told them that the app the building offered for use was Carson, the Neumann-owned competitor. The Norwalk apartments have since disappeared from Alfred’s site.

With a serious competitor that just raised $350 million, Alfred will find it hard to raise more money. Do investors want to back Alfred’s team against a more experienced and better funded rival?

This controversy shows the danger of doing business with unscrupulous people. Neumann’s money was tempting, but the juice wasn’t worth the squeeze.

Normally, a founder who created a multibillion dollar public company would be a great business partner — even if he’d made some mistakes. Mistakes help people learn.

But we must distinguish between strategic errors and plain lack of ethics. You can learn strategy, but you can’t learn scruples.

What do you think of Neumann’s return? Leave a comment at the bottom and let me know!

More on tech:

Will Adam Neumann Change Housing Forever?

John Doerr’s Biggest Mistake

Talking Startup Fundraising with Travis King of Launch Point Labs

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Photo: WeWork and Flow founder Adam Neumann

Chinese Stop Paying Mortgages as Real Estate Crisis Spreads

Chinese homebuyers are refusing to pay their mortgages in a boycott that’s spreading across the country. Many fear the homes they’re paying for will never be finished.

Now, suppliers to builders are also defaulting on loans.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


From ABC News Australia:

A fast-growing mortgage boycott across dozens of cities in China has prompted some property suppliers to cease their bank loan repayments, raising fears the escalating situation could trigger a further downward spiral in the sector and even threaten the country’s financial stability. 

Hundreds of landscapers, sculpture-makers and construction companies have expressed their anger that they have been bled dry because some debt-saddled developers did not pay their bills while they continued to service or help build apartments, Chinese media Caixin reported.


Chinese usually buy homes and start making payments before they’re complete.

The boycott has spread to 90 cities in mere weeks.

The Chinese government is censoring reports on the boycott, per Bloomberg. So the situation inside China may be even worse than reported.

A real estate meltdown is a catastrophe for the average Chinese saver. Chinese put 70% of their wealth in real estate, compared to 35% in the US.

The property sector accounts for about 25% of GDP. China’s GDP growth has flatlined as the sector sputters.

And it gets worse. Chinese banks have lent huge sums to property developers.

As developers default, bank runs are spreading across China. Government thugs have beaten protesters desperately trying to recover their life’s savings.

Amid a bleak economy and constant COVID lockdowns, workers are struggling. Youth unemployment has spiked, hitting over 19% last month.

Consider the picture for the average Chinese person: most of your savings are tied up in an apartment that will never be completed, the rest is in a bank that’s insolvent, and your only child can’t find work.

Revolution might start to sound good.

In the US, we know that a property crisis fueled by heavy debt can spread quickly. Huge liabilities pop up at different institutions unpredictably.

This undermines confidence in the entire financial system. When that happens, you get a financial crisis.

That’s what China is facing today.

At stake is the legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party. Officials have staked their power on offering ever-increasing living standards.

Those days may be over.

I can only hope that Chinese citizens prevail and oust a government that has brutalized them for generations.

More on China:

Mass Protests in China as Bank Runs Continue

Will Evergrande Spark a Global Financial Crisis?

China Is Killing its Tech Industry

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Photo: Unfinished Chinese apartment buildings being demolished in Kunming, China

Did LinkedIn Just Build the Future of Work?

I think I just saw the future of work. And it is good.

In an amazing new video from The Wall Street Journal, reporter Adam Falk tours LinkedIn’s completely redesigned headquarters. He finds every sort of office space a human could want…plus free lattes.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


LinkedIn’s headquarters in Silicon Valley used to look like any other office. Rows of identical desks and the occasional uninspired conference room.

But after the pandemic, LinkedIn knew it couldn’t bring everyone back into an old-school cubicle farm.

So it completely redesigned its headquarters for a combination of in-person and remote work. (Hint: it looks a lot like WeWork.)

The result: essentially every kind of workspace imaginable, grouped into little pods. Soft chairs, high-backed booths, outdoor seating and, of course, private offices.

I like this variety. The idea is to help people work in different postures throughout their day.

This avoids aches and pains.

I’m experimenting with it myself right now! Instead of the table where I usually sit hunched for hour after hour, I’m in a comfy easy chair for a bit.

I don’t know about you, but my neck is sore just about every day! I’m hoping this helps.

The variety of seating also helps deaden noise. Those high-backed booths block sound a lot better than an open floor full of desks.

When I was working in an office, noise was my nemesis. Co-worker conversations could make it very hard to focus.

And best of all, LinkedIn doesn’t even make employees to come to this beautiful office! Everyone can be remote or in-office for whatever amount of time they like.

I love working from home. Cutting out a commute and avoiding noise make me a lot happier.

But it doesn’t work for everyone. My friend Tim*, who is in sales, hates remote work.

He explained that it’s very hard to get fired up about cold calling when you’re lounging in your living room. And there are lots of Tims, productive workers that love being in an office.

Then there are other people like my friend Jason*. He might enjoy remote work if he were single, but with a small child and a wife who also works remote, peace and quiet are hard to come by.

So any larger company like LinkedIn is wise to have at least some office space to accommodate workers like these.

The one problem I see with LinkedIn’s campus is too few private offices. Sometimes people need a room with a door so they can blot out the world and focus.

I’d also add an optional, free WeWork membership for every employee. This would be great for staffers that don’t live close to headquarters but still need to get out of the house.

And at $299 a month, the cost is nothing for a giant like LinkedIn.

In all, I think LinkedIn did an awesome job! Less pampered workers would be in awe of the glass atria and cozy couches.

I spent many years in grey cubicle farms and never liked it much. I hope this beautiful office serves as a model and we all work better in the future!

What do you think the future of work is? Leave a comment at the bottom and let me know!

More on tech:

Apple Tackles the Most Aggressive Spyware with New Lockdown Mode

Managing a Crisis the Sequoia Way

Why Tech Stocks Are Oversold

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

*Not their real names

Apartments Are Banned from 76% of San Francisco

I came across in incredible stat today. Apartments are banned in 76% of San Francisco. It’s no wonder that it’s the most expensive city in the United States.

In fact, given increasingly restrictive zoning, 54% of the homes in San Francisco could not be built today! The picture in New York City is similar, where 40% of Manhattan homes couldn’t be built under current zoning codes.

I find the anti-development discourse often focuses on “greedy developers” when a more appropriate person to focus on might be “working class mom who doesn’t want to live 90 minutes from work.” How we frame the problem may be the key to winning the argument. The “neighborhood character” trope is another NIMBY standby, but against a struggling single mom who spends four hours a day commuting on a bus to her job as a nanny and just wants an affordable place near her job, i think their argument loses its punch.

Housing in expensive cities like SF and NYC could get more affordable in a different, more painful way. Everyone I know of who lives in San Francisco is decrying staggering amounts of crime and school closures that have gone on over a year. The tech industry has moved to Zoom and found real efficiencies there. I live in the NYC area and can attest that crime has increased substantially.

Perhaps the way San Francisco and similar cities get cheaper isn’t by building, but by self-destruction.

For more on zoning and politics, check out these posts:

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

Photo: “Typical San Francisco house” by 4nitsirk is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

Rocket Companies Is One of the Most Active in the Options Market

Shares in Rocket Companies jumped over 70% today, and that optimism is also reflected in the options market:

RKT stock was one of the most active stocks in the options market yesterday with total volume of over 365,000 contracts. Call option volume outpaced puts by a ratio of 6-to-1. Overall volume was nearly three times higher than normal.

More here. This is particularly striking given that Rocket Companies, while a substantial company, is tiny compared to giants like Apple, Amazon, etc.

For more on the Wallstreetbets phenomenon, check out these posts:

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

Photo: “Dan Gilbert (left) and me” by Moondog Mascot is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

Big Profits And Lots of Short Sellers Could Make Rocket Companies a Winner

Rocket Companies, a mortgage originator, has returned solid profits in 2020’s hot real estate market:

Boosted by the boom in mortgage refinancing activity, the company had $15.7 billion in total revenue, or more than triple its $5.1 billion revenue in 2019.

Its net income, or profit, skyrocketed to $9.4 billion from just under $1 billion the year before. And the company increased its closely watched gain on sale margin by 127 basis points year-over-year to 4.46%.

It’s also the number 2 most popular stock on Reddit’s Wallstreetbets.

And yet, short sellers are betting against the company: 37% of shares are sold short (measured as a percentage of the float). This is comparable to money losing companies like Tanger Factory Outlet Centers.

It’s true that Rocket does face risks from increasing interest rates, but big profits along with a not-outrageous valuation for a high growth company mitigate that. Add in the possibility of a short squeeze and things get interesting.

I prefer a more diversified portfolio, but compared to other Reddit darlings like GameStop, Palantir and Sundial Growers, Rocket looks a lot more attractive.

For more on the Wallstreetbets phenomenon, check out these posts:

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

Photo: “ATREX – Sounding Rockets” by NASA Goddard Photo and Video is licensed under CC BY 2.0

This One Trend is Driving Every Financial Market

Regardless of which market we look at, we see a similar trend: skyrocketing prices since the beginning of the pandemic. You can see this in the S&P 500, a broad measure of stocks:

In commodities:

In the increase in real estate prices and the corresponding decrease in capitalization rates (this chart is from Dallas…see similar trends in other cities in the research papers linked in this post):

And even in Treasury bonds (recall that the yield moves in the opposite direction from the price, so a lower yield means a higher price):

Why are all these markets looking the same? The likeliest cause is a huge jump in the money supply. The Federal Reserve has aggressively printed money since the beginning of the pandemic, looking to counter the seismic economic shock. I think this is probably appropriate. In any case, the effect is unmistakable, however you measure money supply.

Here’s how the “monetary base,” or “the sum of currency in circulation and reserve balances (deposits held by banks and other depository institutions in their accounts at the Federal Reserve),” has expanded:

If you look at another definition of the money supply, M1 (“the sum of currency held by the public and transaction deposits at depository institutions”), it looks like this:

And if you broaden your definition of money supply to M2 (“M1 plus savings deposits, small-denomination time deposits (those issued in amounts of less than $100,000), and retail money market mutual fund shares”), you see the same familiar pattern:

Whichever way you slice it, there’s a lot more money out there than there used to be. That money can be used to bid up stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, bitcoin, Gamestop, or whatever you like.

There is some debate in the literature about whether you can draw a correlation between the money supply and increasing stock prices. This study sounds a cautionary note:

future profits may not change, if interest rates decline at the same time that demand for firms’ products, and thus their sales, decline.

This could be relevant for companies that can’t deliver their products in a contactless manner. But companies that can have been thriving.

In all, it appears that the massive increase in the money supply is driving financial markets of every stripe in one direction: up. Until the Fed changes policy, I suspect the bias is likely to be toward buoyant markets, especially with vaccines coming on line and the pandemic’s end in sight.

Have a great weekend, everyone!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Photo: “Governor Jerome Powell speaks at Brookings panel, ‘Are there structural issues in U.S. bond markets?'” by BrookingsInst is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0