Tag Archives: Markets

‘There’s a Lot of Agony Out There’: Munger on CRE

“A lot of real estate isn’t so good any more,” Munger said. “We have a lot of troubled office buildings, a lot of troubled shopping centres, a lot of troubled other properties. There’s a lot of agony out there.”

Berkshire Hathaway Vice Chairman Charles Munger has truly seen it all. At age 99, he’s an astute observer of markets and remains Warren Buffett’s right hand man.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


So when he sat down for a rare interview with the Financial Times this weekend, I couldn’t miss it.

Munger notes that many US banks are holding bad loans on commercial property. Those properties are declining in value due to higher vacancies and interest rates.

Loans for commercial real estate aren’t like residential mortgages. Instead of being fixed for 30 years, they usually must be refinanced every 5-10 years.

Banks are increasingly wary of CRE loans. From the Munger interview:

He noted that banks were already pulling back from lending to commercial developers. “Every bank in the country is way tighter on real estate loans today than they were six months ago,” he said. “They all seem [to be] too much trouble.”

If the refinancing happens at all, it will be at a much higher rate. If the owner can’t pay the new, higher payments, he may default.

That leaves the bank holding the bag.

And if the owner tries to sell, he faces a tough market.

Sales of office space are down 66% in the past year. There are no buyers at any price for vacant office space in NYC, according to a broker friend of mine.

Berkshire is staying away from this tough market. So is little old Francis — my real estate investments are in higher end apartments and fulfillment centers.

What’s the future for CRE? Leave a comment and let us know what you think!

This is the last blog for this week. I’m heading down to Kentucky tomorrow to visit my grandma!

See you on Monday, May 8th!

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

More on markets:

From $10 Billion to Zero — Late Stage Ice Age

Interest Rate Time Bomb May Kill Hedge Funds

To Riyadh, Hat in Hand

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Advertisement

Executives Dumped Shares Shortly Before First Republic Rescue

Top executives dumped shares in First Republic bank this year, shortly before its near collapse and rescue. These sales were not part of pre-announced plans.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


From The Wall Street Journal:

Top executives of First Republic Bank sold millions of dollars of company stock in the two months before the bank’s shares plummeted during the panic over the health of regional lenders.

Executives had been selling for months, the documents show. Executive Chairman James Herbert II has sold $4.5 million worth of shares since the start of the year. In all, insiders have sold $11.8 million worth of stock so far this year at prices averaging just below $130 a share. The bank’s chief credit officer, its president of private wealth management and chief executive together sold $7 million worth of stock.

None of the filings for the executives’ sales indicate that they were executed under 10b5-1 plans, which are pre-scheduled sales designed to insulate insiders from accusations of trading on nonpublic information.

Their timing was great! The stock is down 72% this year, with most losses coming in the last week.

If authorities can find evidence that they knew the bank was teetering and didn’t warn investors, these men belong in prison.

Today, some of the country’s largest banks are working on a rescue for First Republic. From Bloomberg:

The nation’s biggest banks are close to agreeing upon a plan to deposit as much as $30 billion with First Republic Bank in an effort supported by the US government to stabilize the battered California lender, according to people with knowledge of the matter.

Customers have been pulling billions from First Republic since the failure of Silicon Valley Bank. This appears to have put First Republic on the brink of being unable to redeem deposits.

First Republic does not appear to be insolvent. But no bank can redeem a huge portion of its deposits at once.

And given these large, well-timed insider sales, the bank seems to have considerable internal dysfunction.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: diversify your deposits.

You can split 50/50 or into even smaller chunks. But be sure to include one or more of the Big 4 banks (JPM, Citi, BoA, Wells).

They can be a pain in the neck to deal with. But they’re the most Too Big to Fail-y banks out there.

What do you think an investigation of First Republic will find?

Leave a comment and let me know!

More on markets:

Time to Bail on Credit Suisse

Where Should Startups Put Their Money Now?

SVB Fallout

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Photo: First Republic CEO Michael J. Roffler

Time to Bail on Credit Suisse

tl,dr: Get out of Credit Suisse.

The Swiss bank is suffering severe stress today, with its stock and bond prices plummeting. Depositors and investors are questioning its ability to survive.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


The Swiss National Bank has pledged to offer liquidity to CS if necessary, per Bloomberg.

However, the stock has barely reacted as of Wednesday afternoon in New York. Investors seem unconvinced.

What has gone so wrong at Credit Suisse?

Just about everything. Again from Bloomberg:

Credit Suisse’s failings have included a criminal conviction for allowing drug dealers to launder money in Bulgaria, entanglement in a Mozambique corruption case, a spying scandal involving a former employee and an executive and a massive leak of client data to the media. Its association with disgraced financier Lex Greensill and failed New York-based investment firm Archegos Capital Management compounded the sense of an institution that didn’t have a firm grip on its affairs. Many fed up clients have voted with their feet, leading to unprecedented client outflows in late 2022. 

Problems came to a head today as CS’s largest investor, the Saudi National Bank, refused to provide more capital to CS.

Credit Suisse appears to have ample reserves to pay depositors.

It has enough cash and highly liquid assets to pay back half its liabilities quickly. It even has 62 billion Swiss francs of cold, hard cash on deposit at central banks.

Yet its stock is in the toilet, and its bonds trade at levels implying a strong possibility of default. The cost to insure its bonds through credit default swaps is also sky high.

Are all 3 of these markets wrong? Maybe, but I wouldn’t want to make that bet.

For companies and individuals, there is little downside to pulling your money out.

Even if the Swiss National Bank, Federal Reserve, or others bail them out, there could be delays in getting your money. That was the case with SVB.

Can you afford that delay?

In the end, I doubt central banks will let CS collapse. But things could get very messy in the mean time.

What do you think of the problems at Credit Suisse?

Leave a comment and let me know!

More on markets:

SVB Fallout

Where Should Startups Put Their Money Now?

SVB Fails

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

SVB Fallout

All modern economies use money. You have to put your money somewhere. Shouldn’t it be safe?


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


The Federal Reserve thinks it should be, and I couldn’t agree more. Over the weekend, the Fed, Treasury and FDIC acted decisively to stop the banking crisis.

From Bloomberg:

The Federal Reserve brought out its bazooka Sunday, guaranteeing funds for any bank whose depositors might have been clicking “withdraw” over the weekend. The central bank saw clear potential for a systemic crisis in the closures of SVB and Signature Bank and acted to kill it before it got started.

Our government acted decisively and all US bank accounts are now protected.

So what’s the future for banking in America?

You have to put your money somewhere, right? And whether you’re an individual or a business, you have to assume that place is safe.

Let’s make regulation catch up with reality.

There should be no limit on FDIC insurance. Any person or business putting its money in a bank account should have peace of mind.

After all, $250,000 is a lot to an individual, but it’s not much for a business. That may not even cover a single payroll.

What’s at stake here is hard working Americans getting the paychecks they earned. No worker should be unable to pay her bills because a bank made bad decisions.

What’s more, individuals and businesses aren’t equipped to figure out how safe a bank is. That’s the job of regulators.

If the regulators fail to prevent disaster, we shouldn’t take it out on the depositors.

But isn’t this a license for banks to do anything?

Not with the right regulations. We should expand stress tests and tight regulation from just the biggest banks to all banks.

This could prevent another SVB.

We should also increase FDIC insurance premiums. Banks pay these premiums to get FDIC insurance.

With the insurance expanding, the premiums must also rise.

And what about the SVB executives and shareholders?

Screw ‘em. Let them lose their jobs and money.

They made bad decisions, and they deserve to pay, big time.

But you know who doesn’t deserve to pay? Hard working people counting on a paycheck.

Finally, what should founders do post-SVB? Create multiple bank accounts.

Perhaps 50% of your money goes into a startup-friendly product like Mercury. The other half can go in old economy but rock solid JP Morgan.

Splitting cash across several accounts, including one or more Big 4 Banks (JPM, BoA, Citi, Wells) is wise. Expect many VC’s to require it.

We dodged a very big bullet this weekend. Let’s celebrate!

More on tech:

SVB Fails

Venture Funding Down 65%

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Venture (But Were Afraid to Ask)

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Photo: “Governor Jerome Powell speaks at Brookings panel, ‘Are there structural issues in U.S. bond markets?’” by BrookingsInst is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

AMC Fails to Deliver Pass 2.6 Million in New Report

I did a double-take when I saw the number.

Fails to deliver in shares of AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc. passed 2.6 million in June. The report, released today by the Securities and Exchange Commission, covers the first half of the month.

Fails to deliver hit 2,653,787 on June 3 before settling at 1,231,742 at the end of the reporting period. Fails to deliver topped 1 million numerous times.


Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!


I’ve been writing about this topic for about a year, and I can’t recall ever seeing a figure so massive. This despite a long history of large fails to deliver in this stock.

AMC’s fails to deliver are way out of line with other stocks. Here are the numbers on the same day for several companies dramatically larger than AMC:

Amazon: 0
Microsoft: 0
Tesla: 24,983

But let’s back up a second: what is a fail to deliver? A fail to deliver occurs when a trade is made but is never finalized.

Now why might a stock like AMC have a pattern of large and persistent fails to deliver? A common reason is naked short selling.

To sell a stock short, you must borrow shares and sell them. Naked shorting is the generally illegal practice of selling short shares you never borrowed.

This is a powerful way to push down a stock’s price.

If you naked short, there’s no limit to the number of shares you can short. After all, you never had to find any to borrow!

Huge numbers of trades have failed in this stock for at least a year. Despite this, the SEC has not investigated these irregularities.

I keep coming back to this topic because I’m amazed at the inaction. Why not find out why the market in this stock is functioning so poorly?

I hope exchanges and regulators dive into this topic right away. We need orderly and fair capital markets for our country to thrive.

What do you think is causing these failed trades? Leave a comment at the bottom and let me know.

More on markets:

Hedge Fund Giant Tiger Global Losing $28 Million an Hour

$6B Hedge Fund Cut Off from Trading As Investigation Looms

Hedge Funds Could Lose Nearly Half of Assets Under Proposed SEC Rule

Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

Citadel Sues to Crush Competitors

“You’re the one who’s trying to regulate your way into a market victory”

Judge Justin Walker

Citadel Securities LLC is suing the SEC to stop curbs on high frequency trading:

A federal judge challenged a lawyer for Citadel Securities LLC about its efforts to thwart a new kind of market order from IEX Group Inc., the stock exchange operator made famous by “Flash Boys.”

“It’s you who’s going to a federal agency and saying stop a private entity from doing what they want to do,” U.S. Circuit Judge Justin Walker said at a hearing in Washington on Monday, after attorney Jeffrey Wall argued that the order type interferes with the natural course of the market.

The order type, known as D-Limit, has a roughly 350-microsecond delay to blunt the advantage of high-frequency traders.

Citadel makes massive sums from high frequency trading.

Brad Katsuyama created the IEX to stop high frequency traders from front running mutual funds and other investors. Now, IEX is offering a new technology, the D-Limit order, to help.

So Citadel sues the SEC to make them stop!

Imagine if Blackberry could’ve sued the government to make it stop the iPhone. Well, Blackberry might be doing a whole lot better today.

But the average person wouldn’t.

In Citadel’s defense, they’re having a tough time lately. Average investors in meme stocks like AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. are suing them in Florida.

And the SEC is considering a ban on payment for order flow, one of Citadel’s main sources of revenue.

It’s interesting to see who’s for the D-limit order. One proponent is Vanguard Group, which holds the savings of many individual investors, including me.

Vanguard is evidently convinced that circumventing high frequency traders will help the average investor. But for Citadel, Vanguard is competition in the market.

And Citadel will stop at nothing to win.

The only real question is: will we let Citadel lobby and sue its way to total control of markets?


This is the last blog for this week. There will be no blog next week; I’ll be visiting Barcelona!

See you on Monday, November 29th.

Until then, enjoy a few of my favorite posts. Happy Thanksgiving, everyone!

Starting a Financial Plan from 0

Citadel Builds Huge Position in AMC Call Options

Male Contraception With an Ultrasound Device?

NJ’s Best Apple Cider Donut

The Painting I Love the Most

Photo: “Ken Griffin” by DanGPhotos1 is licensed under CC BY 2.0

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Facebook/etc. using the buttons at the bottom of the page. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Amazon Business American Express Card

You already shop on Amazon. Why not save $100?

If you’re approved for this card, you get a $100 Amazon gift card. You also get up to 5% back on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases, 2% on restaurants/gas stations/cell phone bills, and 1% everywhere else.

Best of all: No fee!

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 and returns have been good so far. More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get your management fees waived for 90 days. With their 1% management fee, this could save you $250 on a $100,000 account.

Misfits Market

My wife and I have gotten organic produce shipped to our house by Misfits for over a year. It’s never once disappointed me. Every fruit and vegetable is super fresh and packed with flavor. I thought radishes were cold, tasteless little lumps at salad bars until I tried theirs! They’re peppery, colorful and crunchy! I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $10 on your first order. 

How Did High Dividend Stocks Perform In the Last Crash?

The Problem

I don’t know about you, but I’m starting to lose patience with bonds. The yields are rock bottom. Inflation is high.

And the interest rate outlook is pointing in one direction: up. This would mean substantial losses for bonds.

So I’ve been looking into high dividend stocks as an alternative. And not just any high dividend companies: the Dividend Aristocrats.

The Dividend Aristocrats

Ultra high dividends are nice, but if the company quickly depletes its cash and has to slash them, it doesn’t do us much good. That’s why Dividend Aristocrats are so attractive.

To get on the list, a company has to raise dividends for 25 years. Straight.

As of 2021, there are 65 Dividend Aristocrats.

The Experiment

Today, I wanted to see how some of the highest yielding Dividend Aristocrats performed in the last stock market crash. It lasted from February 19 to March 23, 2020.

The S&P 500 index lost 33.9% of its value in a matter of weeks. Not gonna lie, it was interesting. 🙂

I focused on companies currently yielding above 3%. I figured there wasn’t much point in replacing bonds with stocks that yield only slightly more.

Only 17 stocks made it into this illustrious group. Call them the Dividend Royals.

The Results

So how did the Dividend Royals do in the last crash?

Not terribly well. On average, they dropped 36%. That’s slightly worse than the S&P 500’s 33.9%.

Why did the Dividend Royals do worse? The fact that a small number of energy and real estate companies in this group suffered huge losses is one major factor.

Bonds, boring and frustrating as they are, did much better. The long-term Treasury fund actually gained 11.7%. The bond market index fund I own lost just 1.2%.

But today, they yield just 1.91% and 1.41% respectively.

Conclusion

Despite being solid, mature companies, high dividend stocks fell further than the market in the most recent crash. However, these creme de la creme of the Dividend Aristocrats all kept paying their fat dividends.

If you can stomach the capital loss, they may be a better bet.

More on markets:

Starting a Financial Plan from 0

FOMO: Investors’ Worst Enemy

Where Can We Hide in a Financial Crisis?

Note: Price data comes from Yahoo! Finance

Photo: “Stock Market Crisis Over” by Wagner T. Cassimiro ‘Aranha’ is licensed under CC BY 2.0

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/Facebook/etc. using the buttons at the bottom of the page. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Amazon Business American Express Card

You already shop on Amazon. Why not save $100?

If you’re approved for this card, you get a $100 Amazon gift card. You also get up to 5% back on Amazon and Whole Foods purchases, 2% on restaurants/gas stations/cell phone bills, and 1% everywhere else.

Best of all: No fee!

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 and returns have been good so far. More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get your management fees waived for 90 days. With their 1% management fee, this could save you $250 on a $100,000 account.

Misfits Market

My wife and I have gotten organic produce shipped to our house by Misfits for over a year. It’s never once disappointed me. Every fruit and vegetable is super fresh and packed with flavor. I thought radishes were cold, tasteless little lumps at salad bars until I tried theirs! They’re peppery, colorful and crunchy! I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $10 on your first order. 

Inside the Archegos Implosion: “We Don’t Know How Far the Tentacles Go”

Brokers are selling over $30 billion worth of positions in imploding hedge fund Archegos Capital Management, shaking markets. Wall Street does not know exactly how many positions the fund holds for two reasons:

  • It is very lightly regulated because it’s organized as a “family office,” rather than a typical hedge fund
  • Archegos didn’t actually own most of the stocks it took positions in, if any. Instead, it owned derivatives called “contracts for difference (CFD’s),” which have few disclosures.

Some experts liken the Archegos blow-up to the bankruptcy of Bear Stearns, which helped precipitate the financial crisis:

“We don’t know how far the tentacles go,” said Joe Saluzzi, co-head of trading at Themis Trading. “Early in the Bear Stearns crisis, the market was fine — until it wasn’t.”

Others are comparing the liquidation of the hedge fund’s positions to that of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) in 1998, which caused severe market turbulence and ultimately required a bailout:

“This reminded me a lot of the Long-Term Capital situation,” Steve Sosnick, chief market strategist at Interactive Brokers, told Insider in an interview.

Long-Term Capital Management, a massive hedge fund staffed by famed traders and Nobel Prize-winning economists, employed such highly leveraged trades that it threatened to expose America’s largest banks to more than $1 trillion in default risks by 1998. The “genius” hedge fund nearly collapsed had it not been for a bailout package from the Federal Reserve and some major Wall Street banks.

However, Archegos’s positions appear to be far smaller than those of LTCM. Nonetheless, Archegos was very heavily leveraged:

Shrouded by the secrecy of CFDs, Hwang was able to build up almost $50 billion in stock positions on the back of the $5 billion to $10 billion that Archegos managed.

Perhaps the greatest source of worry for markets is uncertainty over exactly how many positions Archegos has and with which banks. This counterparty risk was a driving factor in the LTCM crisis in 1998 and the financial crisis of 2008:

…it seems clear that the banks didn’t realize until too late that they were holding similar positions, with malign implications for efforts to keep markets in those shares from falling further.

“You can have a suspicion that maybe this person is doing this trade with a bunch of other people,” said Jay Dweck, a former trading and risk-management executive at Goldman and Morgan Stanley and now consults for banks and hedge funds. “But no one knows the aggregate.”

In all, given the smaller size of the portfolio being liquidated and the current buoyant state of markets, I don’t expect any extreme shock from Archegos going under. I think the experience with LTCM, Bear Stearns, Lehman and others will also stand banks and regulators in good stead when dealing with Archegos. But you could see some choppiness for a while as we find out who is exposed to Archegos and wind down those positions.

Another possible outcome is stricter regulation, especially of these opaque family offices, which I think would be good for markets. Indeed, regulators are already scrutinizing hedge funds after the run-up in GameStop shares this year stung some with huge losses. From the WSJ:

The steep losses at Archegos come as a council of top U.S. regulators known as the Financial Stability Oversight Council is already scheduled to meet on Wednesday to discuss hedge-fund activity during the pandemic-triggered crisis.

For more on Archegos and markets, check out these posts:

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

Photo: “Fire” by Mike Poresky is licensed under CC BY 2.0

A Giant Hedge Fund Is Imploding, Taking Stocks with It

Ten billion dollar hedge fund Archegos Capital Management is imploding, causing banks to frantically sell its portfolio to stem further losses:

One mystery in a dramatic year on Wall Street has been the identity of a trader whose persistent purchases have sent shares in ViacomCBS Inc., Discovery Inc. and a handful of other companies surging even when the broader market was down.

People familiar with the transactions say the answer is former Tiger Asia manager Bill Hwang. Late last week Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Deutsche Bank AG swiftly unloaded large blocks of shares in those companies and others, part of the liquidation of positions at Mr. Hwang’s Archegos Capital Management.

The sales approached $30 billion in value, some of the people said, and fueled a 27% plunge Friday in shares of ViacomCBS—an unusually large decline in a widely held, large-capitalization stock on a day with no significant company-specific news. Billions of market value in other companies were wiped out as the sales continued, surprising market participants who called the size and speed of these stock sales unprecedented.

Hwang had placed giant bets on several stocks funded with borrowed money, and his fund suffered major losses when the stocks moved against him:

…a major actor in supporting companies’ share prices appears to have been undone by his continuing to add to leveraged bets as markets soared. The strategy fell apart when some of those bets started to reverse on him.

There were serious warning signs about Hwang’s conduct, which his banks, including Nomura and Credit Suisse, did not heed:

U.S. securities filings show Credit Suisse was prime broker in 2011 and 2012 to Mr. Hwang’s former firm, Tiger Asia Management LLC. Tiger Asia handed money back to investors after Mr. Hwang admitted in December 2012 that the hedge fund criminally used inside information from investment banks at least three times to profit on securities trades.

This is the latest in a string of problems for Credit Suisse:

Credit Suisse is still digesting the collapse earlier this month of Greensill, a British supply-chain finance company that declared bankruptcy shortly after the Swiss bank froze funds that provided it with liquidity. The double hit could be an extraordinary run of bad luck; there were other banks caught up in both failures. Alternatively, it could point to endemic problems of risk management at Credit Suisse. The Swiss company carried on working with Greensill despite internal concerns.

So if you see volatility in stocks like Viacom, Discovery, Credit Suisse, etc. in the coming days, you’ll know where it’s coming from. I do wonder if other stocks may be impacted by this forced selling of Archegos’ positions.

For more on what’s moving markets, check out these posts:

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

Photo: “Boom-goes-the-dynamite” by Aaron & Alli is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0

The US Government Is Selling Its Bitcoin

The US government is selling its bitcoin…all $38,000 worth:

Tucked away among the Ford, Dodge and Chevy sedans, the 12,000-gallon storage container and the inoperable Caterpillar tractor being auctioned off by the U.S. government is an unusual item: 0.7501 of a Bitcoin.

The federal government did not reveal the source of its cryptocurrency holdings, but I imagine they were probably seized in a bust of some sort. Indeed, a far larger collection was sold off when the Silk Road was shut down:

The government doesn’t say where its surplus digital currency came from. And while it’s a far cry from the 30,000 Bitcoins auctioned off by the U.S. Marshals Service in 2014 after they were seized from the Silk Road marketplace, the GSA auction is one more indication of how Bitcoin is becoming more and more mainstream.

This does make me wonder if eventually states and sovereign wealth funds will buy crypto and hold it. Can the day be far in the future?

For more on the latest in cryptocurrencies, check out these posts:

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

Photo: “Vice President Joe Biden visit to Israel March 2016” by U.S. Embassy Jerusalem is licensed under CC BY 2.0