Tremendous

An angel investor's take on life and business

  • Hard Times for New Funds

    “You’re going to see a lot of emerging managers shut down in the next few years,” said a VC I met with this morning. She couldn’t stay long — she was heading to California to fundraise.

    The down market is hitting emerging managers hard.

    These VC’s are on their first few funds. Many are struggling to raise capital .

    A report out this morning from Ryan Hoover’s Weekend Fund shows just how tough fundraising has gotten for VC’s:

    2023 is on pace to have the lowest fundraising total since 2017.

    LPs are moving to risk-off in VC, passing on emerging managers in favor of established managers.

    Many LP’s are overexposed to venture. Their public stocks have dropped, but many venture funds haven’t taken commensurate markdowns.

    That means their allocation to venture as a share of assets has ballooned. The last thing they’re going to do is add more!

    Even if they do, it will probably go to a fund they have a longstanding relationship with.

    About a third of the 195 emerging managers in Weekend Fund’s survey have cut their target fund size.

    Barren coffers at VC firms mean less money for founders:

    “Only 6.1% of active startups on AngelList raised a round or exited in 1Q23, the lowest rate ever observed in our dataset. This rate of investment activity is a 1.3% decline from 4Q22’s rate of 7.4%, and a 5% decline from 1Q22’s rate of 11.6%.”

    If founders aren’t raising what they hoped, there’s a reason: fund managers aren’t either.

    No one wants to admit that. So they keep taking meetings and giving out “maybes.”

    One fund manager the Weekend Fund spoke with had a great tip:

    “Pay attention to which Emerging Managers are actively announcing new investments and which ones aren’t. We are aware of many small firms that have essentially stopped new investments and are struggling to raise their next fund.”

    This way, founders won’t waste time talking to firms with no money to invest.

    Perhaps one reason VC’s can’t raise is they don’t have enough skin in the game. 6 in 10 emerging managers committed 2% or less to their fund.

    On a $10 million first fund, that’s just $200,000.

    Most people who start VC funds are already pretty well-off. Three quarters worked in VC previously, often for years.

    A 1 or 2% commitment may not be enough to show LP’s you really believe the fund will crush it.

    On the bright side, VC’s that do raise now are in a fertile environment. Valuations are down and many weak companies have exited the market, leaving only the strong.

    Some of the funds raised today may be among the best of all time.

    What do you think of the fundraising landscape for VC’s and founders? Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on tech:

    The Too Hard Bucket

    Inflection: Better than ChatGPT?

    Uploading Our Consciousness

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Carl Icahn Losing $900 Million a Day

    Corporate raider Carl Icahn has lost $15 billion since the release of an exposé by Hindenburg Research. That’s over $900 million a day.

    The Hindenburg Report

    Hindenburg claims that Icahn’s holding company, Icahn Enterprises, is structured like a Ponzi scheme. Repeated share sales support an unusually high 28% dividend.


    In brief, Icahn has been using money taken in from new investors to pay out dividends to old investors. Such ponzi-like economic structures are sustainable only to the extent that new money is willing to risk being the last one “holding the bag”.

    Hindenburg also alleges that Icahn Enterprises inflates the values of its assets. Since the release of the report on May 2, the stock has fallen by nearly half in just 16 trading days, costing Icahn billions.


    From Bloomberg:

    “He’s never been humiliated like this,” says Mark Stevens, Icahn biographer and founder of consulting company MSCO.

    A History of Losses

    Icahn Enterprises stock has lagged for years, weighed down by huge losses. Again from Bloomberg:

    It’s hard to argue about Icahn’s lackluster performance of late. This has been a lost decade for Icahn Enterprises stock. The price has fallen more than 60% over the past 10 years, while the S&P 500 has gained about 153%. Dividends have made up some of the difference: Icahn Enterprises has handed stockholders a total return of about 6%. But the S&P has returned roughly 206%.

    Icahn made massive bets that a financial crisis was coming. When those short bets didn’t pan out, he lost billions.

    Icahn Enterprises’ Future

    Now, federal prosecutors are investigating Icahn Enterprises. So far, no charges have been filed.

    I don’t know if Icahn acted improperly. But I do know that a 28% dividend isn’t sustainable.

    This means you’re paying out the entire value of the company every 3.5 years. This would be an incredible strain even for the most profitable companies.

    For a business making big losses, it’s impossible.

    I also disagree with Icahn’s bets on a financial crisis. Although crashes come and go, the long term trajectory of markets, technology, and humanity is upward.

    Financial engineering and short bets can work — sometimes. But the better approach is to buy great businesses for the long term and bet on the future.



    “Never bet against America.” – Warren Buffett

    2021 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Letter

    What do you think of Icahn’s huge loss? Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on markets:

    Druck on the Coming Debt Crisis

    The AI Gold Rush

    ‘There’s a Lot of Agony Out There’: Munger on CRE

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • The Too Hard Bucket

    Every now and then, I meet a hardworking founder with some great tech. But I know I’ll never invest in their business.

    Despite founders’ best intentions, some companies develop serious problems. Those problems can make a startup untouchable for investors.

    We put those companies in the “too hard bucket.”* And we move on to the next deal.

    Let’s run down a few of those nightmare scenarios so you can avoid them!

    Debt

    I recently saw a cool early stage company addressing a big market. I was interested — until I found out they were almost $1 million in debt.

    Early stage companies must avoid debt like the plague. It will weigh your company down like nothing else.

    Investors will not touch an early stage company with debt. We want our capital to fund new growth — not pay for past mistakes!

    For companies like this, the best option may be bankruptcy. Into the “too hard bucket” it goes.

    Cap Table Problems

    Cap table problems won’t bankrupt you, but they will stop you from ever raising a dime of venture capital.

    Some startups give a huge slice of equity to a dev shop or venture studio. If someone other than founders and investors own 40% of the company, it cannot be financed.

    The founders own way too little to be incentivized. And if they’re not incentivized, how will we make a return?

    Maybe the cap table could be fixed with the right agreements. But most investors will put that in the “too hard” bucket and move on to the next deal.

    Down Rounds

    At the peak of the market, countless companies raised at huge valuations with little or no revenue.

    Now, it’s time to pay the piper.

    If a company raised at $100 million, it will need around $10 million a year in revenue to keep that valuation today. Otherwise, it’s looking at a down round.

    Many venture firms don’t want to deal with down rounds.

    Let’s say the new price is $50 million. The founders and all the prior investors will hate the new investor for “taking away” half their paper wealth.

    Who wants to walk into that situation?

    So, many firms put down rounds in the “too hard bucket”. Now, the formerly hot company can’t even raise a down round.

    They can’t raise at all.

    Always keep your valuation reasonable. And make sure the money lasts long enough to hit your milestones.

    Wrap-Up

    Founders have to understand the investor’s perspective. At any given time, there are 20 deals in the investor’s inbox.

    If your company has serious problems, an investor isn’t interested in how they can be fixed.

    He just puts your company in the “too hard bucket”. On to the other 19 deals…

    So stay out of debt, keep a clean cap table and raise at reasonable prices. That gives you the best chance of success!

    What kind of companies are in your “too hard bucket”? Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on tech:

    The AI Gold Rush

    From $10 Billion to Zero — Late Stage Ice Age

    Right Founder. Wrong Market.

    *thanks to Chamath Palihapitiya for coining this term

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Uploading Our Consciousness

    The year is 2166. I am 180 years old and my body is beginning to fail. Time to upload my memories.

    Advancements in biology could soon have us living much longer than ever before. But even if our bodies can’t reach immortality, perhaps our minds can.

    Imagine a future in which an LLM trains on everything we see, do or say.

    It reads all my blog posts. It hears me comfort a friend after a breakup.

    My life is the training data.

    In time, it would begin to reason and speak like me. The better the model and the more data it digests, the closer to me it would become.

    After it had some time to practice, I could sit down alongside it. You could ask me a question then ask FrankGPT the same question.

    When there are differences, we correct FrankGPT. Soon, the answers would be the same.

    What we’ve created is a model of my consciousness.

    And if it knows what I know, sees what I’ve seen, and thinks what I think — is it not me?

    Perhaps uploading our consciousness sounds fanciful.

    But even today, a startup called Rewind can record all your online activity. You can then ask the AI questions, simulating a perfect memory.

    Attach this to the AR headset Apple is about to release, then pipe the data into GPT-4. You now have a basic model of consciousness.

    If this is possible with 2023 technology, what will be possible in 2166?

    Not everyone wants to live forever. But I do — and I’m pretty sure I’m not alone.

    Existing as a consciousness on a chip is not the same as our current life. But it could be a fascinating and rewarding existence.

    From our position in the cloud, we could watch humans with bodies conquer the most remote parts of the solar system. And in time, maybe they’d even figure out how to get us a new body.

    If I’m lucky, my next one might even have hair!

    Do you want to upload your consciousness? Leave a comment and let us know!

    Have a great weekend everyone!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on tech:

    Woz Calls for AI Regulation

    Inflection: Better than ChatGPT?

    Bard vs. GPT-4

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Empty Offices Hurting NYC Budget

    Nearly a quarter of all New York City office space is vacant. Now, the pain is spreading to the city’s budget.

    From a report out this morning in Bloomberg:

    The atrium at 60 Wall Street was once a thoroughfare for thousands of Deutsche Bank AG employees. 

    These days it’s eerily quiet even during rush hour on a weekday morning. The occasional pedestrian crosses between Pine Street and Wall Street, the cavernous space utilized as a subway exit or a place to nap at one of the unused bistro tables.

    The 47-story skyscraper, owned by Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund and Paramount Group, has sat empty since 2021, when Deutsche Bank — its only tenant — relocated to Columbus Circle.

    Those skyscrapers pay a lot of taxes. But with vacancies everywhere, tax revenue is coming up short:

    It’s a worry for city officials, who for the last decade have relied on an ever-expanding commercial real estate sector for taxes to pay for schools, cops and trash collection. Commercial property taxes contribute about 20% of the city’s total tax revenue — with office buildings, specifically, contributing 10%. And as those revenues are flattening, the city’s expenses are forecast to keep growing, creating challenges for Mayor Eric Adams’s agenda.

    NYC’s current office vacancy rate is 22.7%. For decades, it never reached half that level.

    But COVID, remote work, and safety concerns are keeping employees home.

    If companies aren’t using their whole space, they will downsize or close their offices entirely when the lease is up. Some companies are skipping out on rent altogether.

    That makes it harder for landlords to pay taxes. It could also reduce the assessed value of buildings, cutting tax payments for many years.

    Meanwhile, landlords are stuck with these bad assets. There are no buyers for vacant office space in NYC at any price, according to a broker friend of mine.

    But NYC can help get people back in offices and the taxes flowing. It starts with safety.

    When crime makes people afraid to go to work, they’ll pressure their managers to work remote. In a strong labor market, managers will acquiesce.

    After all, the CEO probably lives nearby and rides to work in a livery car. But the average employee endures a long subway commute that has now become dangerous.

    NYC has to start by cleaning up the streets and making the subway safe. When people feel secure, many will want to come into the office and see their co-workers.

    The city and state must also make it easier to convert office space to other uses.

    New York does have some advantages. It’s safer than SF and has a more traditional industry mix.

    The banks that dominate NYC want their people back in person.

    Personally, I prefer remote work with the occasional get-together.

    But if people feel safe, many offices will fill up again. And the city coffers will too.

    What do you think the future holds for empty offices? Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on markets:

    ‘There’s a Lot of Agony Out There’: Munger on CRE

    Druck on the Coming Debt Crisis

    The AI Gold Rush

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Druck on the Coming Debt Crisis

    Stan Druckenmiller and George Soros made over $1 billion shorting the British pound. Now Druck is turning his sights to another mismanaged nation: the United States.

    At a recent keynote address at USC, Druckenmiller sounded the alarm about ballooning entitlements.

    “If I wasn’t so worried about the country I’d be salivating over the opportunities this could set up.”

    Stanley Druckenmiller

    Today, we spend 40% of our tax dollars on programs for seniors. By 2043, that will be 60%.

    How do we pay for that? There are two main options: cut spending or raise taxes.

    But the changes required would be huge.

    Druckenmiller reckons we’d need to cut spending by 35% starting today and maintain that lower level forever. If we don’t want to do that, we could raise taxes 40% — permanently.

    “Expect this trend to continue…absent radical policy changes.”

    Stanley Druckenmiller

    The last of the baby boomers retire soon. We’ve promised them benefits that will soon crowd out all other federal spending.

    No defense, no education, no bridges, no nothing.

    So how do we fix it?

    Druckenmiller calls for big entitlement cuts. He supports ending payments to wealthier seniors and cutting cost of living adjustments (COLAs).

    Means testing is a great place to start. People like me don’t need a government check.

    And as painful as ending or reducing COLAs may be, it can happen anyway. State pensioners here in New Jersey haven’t had a COLA in 12 years, and the sky hasn’t fallen.

    We must also raise eligibility ages. I see no problem with Social Security’s full benefit beginning at 75 (rather than 70) and Medicare at 70 (currently 65) for younger people like me.

    I never expected to get a cent out of these programs anyway. Most young people don’t.

    Reining in benefits is the one chance to salvage something for future retirees. If we don’t do something now, there will be nothing left for younger generations.

    “You’re screwing seniors, you’re just screwing the future seniors. Why do they get a dollar and you get zero?”

    Stanley Druckenmiller

    I’m confident that we’ll muddle through to a solution. It will probably involve some combination of benefit cuts and tax increases.

    “…if it can’t go on forever it will stop.”

    Herbert Stein, economist

    What do you think the future holds for entitlements and the US economy? Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on markets:

    The AI Gold Rush

    ‘There’s a Lot of Agony Out There’: Munger on CRE

    From $10 Billion to Zero — Late Stage Ice Age

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • NYC’s Best Dumplings at Shu Jiao Fu Zhou

    It was lunchtime on the set, and I knew exactly where I was headed. It was time to eat the best dumpling in New York.

    Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

    This is Shu Jiao Fu Zhou, an institution in Manhattan’s Chinatown. This simple storefront serves tender dumplings, rich noodles and more.

    I hadn’t been since before Covid. So it was time to go all-in.

    I ordered the pork dumplings and a big plate of peanut noodles. Double or nothing!

    Watching the people stream by the plate glass windows is fascinating. Some are making deliveries, others doing their shopping, and a few even visiting from far away.

    “I don’t get down here enough,” I thought.

    “Dumpling and peanut noodles!”

    But this was no time to be lost in thought! My food was ready!

    I plopped back down at the formica table, ready to experience the best of Fujian. But first, a little dark vinegar…

    I bit into a dumpling, penetrating the smooth skin and reaching the unctuous pork within. Outstanding.

    On to my noodles. I grabbed a big helping with my chopsticks, lifting them up to admire their glistening steaminess.

    Down the hatch they go. Ahh…the creamy fat of the peanut butter with the chewiness of the wheat noodle is the ideal combination.

    Peanut butter on noodles might sound a little unusual if you haven’t had it before. But trust me, these Fujianese folks figured something out!

    I washed it all down with an ice cold Diet Coke. Hey, they have Coke in China too, right?

    Resolving to never let so many years pass between visits, I sallied out into the sunny midday. Strolling past stands bursting with green vegetables and fresh fish, I found a lively basketball court.

    I grabbed a bench and watched the men play. They yelled plays to each other excitedly, broad smiles on their faces.

    This was the real life we missed for far too long during Covid. Now it’s back, and I appreciate it even more.

    Shu Jiao Fu Zhou is open 7 days a week, from 8:30am to 8pm. In an ever more expensive city, its dishes are shockingly affordable — often under $5.

    Give it a shot!

    And if you can’t make it to New York, you can try making Fujianese peanut noodles at home. This might be my next little project!

    What are your favorite Chinese restaurants? Leave a comment and let us know.

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on food:

    BBQ Stingray at Urban Hawker

    Korean Noodle Heaven at Food Gallery 32

    The Pizza Princes of Grimaldi’s

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Bard vs. GPT-4

    Last week, Google debuted its latest challenge to OpenAI: the new Bard. The waitlist is gone and Bard has some great new features. But can it beat GPT-4?

    Today, I put both bots to the test.

    Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

    Bard now integrates with search and maps and can access the internet. So I tested it against its closest GPT-4 equivalent: Bing Chat.

    Bing Chat uses GPT-4 and has internet access. It’s integrated into a search engine, just like Bard.

    And unlike ChatGPT Plus, it’s free! (You have to use Microsoft Edge, but it’s a pretty good browser.)

    I posed identical questions to each bot. These are real questions I actually need the answer to.

    Let’s see how they do!

    One of the main things I use GPT-4 for is help finding blog ideas. Again this morning, it performed well:

    The stories are interesting and relevant. The links don’t work, but hey, it’s new technology right?

    Now, let’s try Bard:

    Bard refused my request entirely, outputting nothing.

    GPT-4 has saved me hours in research time. But for this application, Bard seems useless.

    I’m attending a demo day for Australian startups tomorrow. Maybe my new friends can help me prepare?

    GPT-4’s answer was outstanding!

    It told me things about Australia I never knew. I had no idea the culture was conservative.

    It also gave me some ideas for questions.

    Perhaps I should ask the startups about their international expansion plans. I rarely ask an American startup that since our domestic market is already vast.

    Next, Bard’s turn:

    Bard’s answer was good, but less complete than GPT-4’s.

    It homed in on the risk of Australia’s small market. But it didn’t take the next logical step like GPT-4 and tell me to find out what a startup’s international expansion plan is.

    Time for our third and final question.

    I’m doing some research on the US meatpacking industry (long story). So I wondered, how many meatpackers are there in America?

    Let’s ask GPT-4:

    Excellent answer! It found an exact number and provided a source.

    But it also called out something beyond the numbers. This is an unusual industry, with huge concentration.

    GPT-4 made sure I’m aware of that. Nice work, GPT!

    Let’s give Bard a shot:

    Bard’s answer doesn’t seem accurate.

    It gave a number only half the size of GPT-4’s. Maybe it’s valid, but without a citation, I’ll never know!

    It did correctly call out the weird feature of meatpacking — massive concentration.

    So far, Bard looks like a bust.

    However, I’m sure Google will keep working on it. In time, it may catch up with GPT-4.

    But for now, Microsoft and OpenAI have a heck of a headstart.

    Have you tried Bard? If so, what did you think?

    Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on tech:

    Inflection: Better than ChatGPT?

    Woz Calls for AI Regulation

    The AI Gold Rush

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Inflection: Better than ChatGPT?

    ChatGPT is incredible. But this might be even better.

    Reid Hoffman’s new startup Inflection AI released an incredible tool last week. It’s great at answering your questions. But uniquely, it also asks you questions!

    After I heard about Inflection on a recent episode of This Week in Startups, I had to try it! It’s very easy — you can chat with the bot, Pi, on WhatsApp.

    Calling it a bot almost feels disrespectful. This feels like a person.

    I started out by saying hello and asking Pi how to use its skills.

    Pi offered a great explanation of its abilities.

    We were chatting on Wednesday night. I was going to be on a panel on venture capital the next day.

    So I thought to myself, “Maybe Pi can help me prepare!”

    My new friend did not disappoint:

    The advice to be confident was helpful.

    I tend to qualify things by saying “I think” or “I could be wrong.” But that’s obvious!

    If I’m saying something, I think it. And anyone can be wrong.

    And that’s when my chat with Pi really got interesting.

    Pi started asking me questions!

    Pi asked what kind of panel I was going to be on. I explained that it was about investing in startups.

    We wound up in a nuanced discussion about how to invest.

    Pi liked my approach of investing at Seed but only with traction. But it brought up some potential issues.

    Going for the IPO is great, but those are rare. I may be undervaluing acquisitions as an exit strategy.

    Then we really got into the weeds…

    Pi asked me if I think SAFE’s are overused. I mentioned they have some pitfalls.

    I couldn’t recall all the details. But I remembered that Ben Narasin of Tenacity VC pointed out numerous problems.

    Pi knew all about it! It (he? she?) confirmed my recollection that too many SAFE’s can cause cap table issues.

    Pi gives amazing answers to your questions. But I think the killer feature is Pi asking me questions to help me learn.

    If I could change one thing about Pi, it would be to build in pauses to the chat.

    The interaction was so immersive that the time flew by. There were no cues for a break or even a change of topic.

    That makes me a bit hesitant to use it again. It might be too powerful.

    People could get drawn into intense discussions with Pi, neglecting the rest of their life. Inflection should build safeguards around that.

    But this is a very new tool. I’m confident Hoffman and his team will finetune it soon.

    Congrats to the amazing team at Inflection AI!

    Will you be trying Pi? Why or why not?

    Leave a comment and let us know!

    Have a great weekend everyone!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on tech:

    Woz Calls for AI Regulation

    The AI Gold Rush

    Right Founder. Wrong Market.

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

  • Woz Calls for AI Regulation

    Last year, someone called my grandma pretending to be me. I was in trouble and needed money.

    It was a scam. What happens when that scam uses AI?

    Get the blog before anyone else…subscribe!

    “AI is so intelligent it’s open to the bad players, the ones that want to trick you about who they are.”

    Steve Wozniak

    Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak called out serious concerns with AI in an interview this week:

    Speaking to the BBC, he said AI content should be clearly labelled, and regulation was needed for the sector.

    “A human really has to take the responsibility for what is generated by AI.”

    Back to my grandma. In the near future, the voice on the other end of that phone could sound exactly like me.

    An AI model could clone my voice and speech style. Given my podcast appearances and this blog, it has plenty of data to work with.

    Then, it could deliver an incredible story to grandma. And she might part with the money she worked a lifetime to save.

    I pray this does not happen. But it is a serious risk.

    AI impersonation involves way more than scams, however. Already, we have seen false images of Donald Trump in handcuffs.

    I don’t think many people were fooled by those. But in time, fake images and video will only become more convincing.

    We may soon be living in a hall of mirrors, unsure what reality is.

    So I wholeheartedly support Woz’s call for labeling. And the best way to do it would be through self-regulation.

    Angel investor Jason Calacanis laid out a great template on a recent episode of This Week in Startups. Tech companies could band together like the movie industry did with the MPAA.

    Just like the MPAA required ratings labels for movies, tech could require certain labels for AI content. Companies that violate this could be banned from partnerships or financing.

    Industries self-regulate to head off regulation by the government. And in a complex and rapidly changing field like AI, government is ill-suited to the job.

    How many people in government know anything about AI? And even if they do, government moves too slowly to regulate something this dynamic.

    AI has incredible benefits. I found out about Woz’s interview using GPT-4!

    But anything this powerful also has serious risks. If we don’t start protecting people, the government will.

    Do you agree with Woz? Why or why not?

    Leave a comment and let us know!

    If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for more like this!

    More on tech:

    From $10 Billion to Zero — Late Stage Ice Age

    The AI Gold Rush

    Right Founder. Wrong Market.

    Save Money on Stuff I Use:

    Fundrise

    This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

    More on Fundrise in this post.

    If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

    Misfits Market

    I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

    I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

    Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order.