Tremendous

An angel investor's take on life and business

  • Unicorns Are Being Minted Faster Than Ever

    On average there are 7x the number of billion dollar exits now than a decade ago.

    This was Eric Feng writing in September 2018. Since then, this staggering increase in startups hitting that magic “unicorn” $1 billion valuation has only accelerated. Data indicates the number of unicorns has nearly doubled again since Feng’s writing. That’s a growth rate almost twice the prior period.

    What’s driving this staggering growth? The biggest factor may be capital flooding the market, making it more likely for companies to be able to raise bigger and bigger rounds of financing at higher valuations, and also making it easier for them to build and scale faster.

    What’s more, changes in technology have made it easier to create a startup than in the past. You can host and scale your computing needs via cloud computing, including with no servers, which was a pitch I saw Friday. You can find engineers on LinkedIn, create a website with SquareSpace, and manage your cap table easily with software. We are getting closer and closer to having a “startup in a box.”

    For more on startups and venture capital, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: “Unicorn Attack!” by Sam Howzit is licensed under CC BY 2.0

  • Palantir Sued Over Controversial Founder Privileges

    A Palantir Technologies Inc. shareholder sued Peter Thiel and its other two founders in Delaware Chancery Court on Thursday, claiming they made themselves “corporate emperor for life” through charter provisions that make investor votes “magically appear and disappear” on demand.

    “The founders decided to completely untether voting power from equity ownership” by providing that their shares always control 49.99% of the vote, no matter how much of Palantir they own, the complaint says. “This power grab stretches the flexible bands that keep Delaware law in balance beyond their breaking point.”

    More here.

    So even if the founders sell their shares, as they have been doing, they control approximately half the company’s votes no matter what. Got only half as many shares as before because you cashed out? No problem! We’ll just give you twice the votes!

    Extreme levels of founder control proved a disaster in the case of WeWork, and the same could happen here. On principle, I wouldn’t want to own shares in a company that will never give me or my fellow stockholders any control. And even Adam Neumann didn’t get to keep his votes if he sold his shares.

    Note that these provisions continue until the last of the three founders dies. The youngest is 37, so it’s basically a lifetime privilege.

    It’s incredible that not only did they create such a bizarre voting structure to deprive shareholders of any say, they’ll defend it in court with shareholder money. On the other hand, if they can’t vote you out, why not? This along with losses every single year of its 18 year existence are enough to keep me far away from this stock.

    For more on Palantir, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel. “Peter Thiel” by jdlasica is licensed under CC BY 2.0

  • GameStop Plans to Dilute Shareholders, Issue Hundreds of Millions in New Stock

    Well, it’s here:

    GameStop Corp. GME -3.90% said it could raise hundreds of millions of dollars from stock sales in the coming months, as the videogame retailer turns to public markets to help support its turnaround plan.

    The company said Monday that it would sell up to 3.5 million shares, adding that the timing and amount of any stock sale would involve various factors.

    Plans for issuing more shares were in their most recent annual report, as I called out here on March 25th.

    3.5 million shares would be about 5% of the current shares outstanding. With GameStop’s share price still 60x above where it was a year ago, I would expect further capital raises. If they can use the money wisely to fund a turnaround to e-commerce, this could wind up being a positive for shareholders in the long term, but in the short term any dilution is likely to hit the stock’s price.

    GameStop has failed at turnarounds before, and I’m skeptical they can do it right this time. If not, shareholders are left with diluted shares in a company that’s hit a dead end.

    For more on GameStop, check out these posts:

    Photo: “Retail GameStop” by ccPixs.com is licensed under CC BY 2.0

  • This Is How Startups Pitch Investors

    You walk into the room, palms sweating. You go over your script in your head. You pray to God your computer doesn’t crash. Eyeing you skeptically are a bunch of grey haired money guys. Don’t screw this up.

    At the very least, that may be how the public imagines the meetings where startups pitch investors. The reality isn’t quite so dramatic, especially now that virtually all meetings are conducted via Zoom. I just got off such a meeting myself with a Software as a Service (Saas) company that was looking to raise about half a million in funding. While I can’t discuss the specifics of the company, here’s an overview of what these meetings are like:

    1) Intro: The founders describe what the company does, what the market is like, and how the company has grown so far.

    2) Deck: The founders go through a slide deck (PowerPoint presentation) that provides further details on what their product does, what makes it different from its competitors products and the size and growth of the market.

    3) Demo: This is when the founders actually show you the product in action. I found this part the most interesting. I remember doing software demos myself when I worked in the field, and invariably, something seems to go wrong that worked in rehearsal 1,000 times. But investors understand that, especially if you can get it working in a few minutes.

    4) Q&A: The other investors on the call asked a lot about the competition. How is this company different from others in its area? What stops larger companies from shoving their way into the market, elbowing you aside?

    I was immediately struck by what a small room one of the founders was in during the call. His chair appeared to nearly touch the door behind him. This brought a smile to my face: they’re not using investor money to pay themselves exorbitant salaries before the company is a clear success.

    The other co-founder mentioned getting a refund of $30 from a vendor that accidentally overcharged them. I don’t think he was trying to make any particular point with this story…it was an incidental detail to a larger narrative. But it made a strong impression on me: these are frugal founders that will be good stewards of the capital they’re raising.

    I can’t say for sure, but I think this company has strong odds of being funded by our investor group. The round is led by other investors and they’ll already be getting a substantial sum from them, in any event.

    The competence and frugality of the founders, coupled with year-on-year growth in the hundreds of percent, is likely to convince a large number of investors.

    For more on startups, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: “Rich Uncle Pennybags” by Sean Davis is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

  • How to Lose $8 Billion in 10 Days

    Archegos Capital Management, run by Bill Hwang, is imploding, racking up losses at a record pace:

    Mr. Hwang alone lost approximately $8 billion in 10 days, a person familiar with the matter said, in what traders and investors say was one of the fastest losses of such a large sum they had ever seen.

    Archegos borrowed massive sums of money to invest it in just a few stocks. Like addicts that get 10 oxycontin prescriptions from 10 different doctors, Hwang never revealed how deep in debt he was to the banks he dealt with:

    Archegos was regularly putting up $15 of collateral to borrow $85, on the high end of leverage for stock-trading firms with similar strategies, said a banking executive familiar with the borrowing.

    Archegos’s lenders say they were unaware of the extent of trades he was making with other banks, information that would have encouraged them to curb their lending.

    The fact that Archegos used swaps, rather than owning shares directly, further obscured his activities. In the “contract for difference” swaps he used, the bank owns the shares while Hwang’s firm pays for the losses or receives the gains on the stock.

    This is important because investors have to disclose to the SEC when they own over 5% of a company. Hwang would have had to make several such disclosures. But because he used swaps instead, none of that information was public, making it harder for banks to find out how heavily leveraged he was. This may have been by design.

    A further odd wrinkle is that Hwang, the son of a pastor, suffused Archegos with religious fervor:

    Mr. Hwang returned clients’ money in 2012 and turned his firm into an office to manage his family’s wealth. He named it Archegos, which, translated from Greek means “leader” or “prince of Christ.” A Christian ethos permeated the firm, with voluntary Friday morning Bible studies where a recording of Bible readings would play to music.

    He tended to view gains as signs of God’s favor:

    “Do I think God loves it? Of course!” Mr. Hwang said in a video, referring to his early investment in LinkedIn. “I’m like a little child looking for, what can I do today, where can I invest, to please our God?”

    If Hwang had a religious certainty about his positions, he’d be all the more likely to hold them even as he lost money, expecting to be vindicated.

    It strikes me how incredibly simple this one-time billionaire investor’s strategy was. Borrow a bunch of money and invest it in a few well-known stocks like Viacom. Anyone could do that if they had access to capital. There was no special sauce, and now Hwang is paying the price for his recklessness.

    For more on Archegos and financial markets, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: “Gamble” by jetglo is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0

  • Amazing Drugs Are Going from the University to the Graveyard, While Patients Pay the Price

    Was the cure for cancer invented in a university, only to be shelved for a lack of funding?

    University labs are creating incredible drugs on a regular basis. Unfortunately, most will never get to the patients that need them so desperately. This is the conclusion of an intriguing book I just read, Preserving the Promise: Improving the Culture of Biotech Investment, by Scott Desain and Scott Fishman.

    The problem is that universities don’t have the massive funds it takes to bring a drug candidate through clinical trials to FDA approval. What about Big Pharma? Well, they’ve been cutting their R&D budgets drastically for years.

    This leaves early stage biotech investors to fund much of the commercialization of new drugs, and there simply aren’t enough of them to fund all the good candidates. Indeed, the number of investors specializing in this area is shrinking. This doesn’t surprise me given that most early-stage investors focus on software startups and have a software background themselves.

    This does leave the few angel investors who specialize in biotech in an enviable position though: more great companies out there than there are angels to fund them means big slices of great companies for less money, and thus higher returns. This is an area that I may be branching out into in the future. Being even a tiny part of creating a new lifesaving drug or medical device would be incredible.

    University policies also hinder the effective commercialization of research, the book notes. Technology Transfer Offices own the patent, but sometimes are hesitant to license it unless they can get lots of revenue for it right away, which is hard for a fledgling company to provide. In other cases, they bury the patent, thinking it unpromising. And university conflict of interest policies can often stop the inventor from continuing to work on the research with company funds. This separates the technology from the person who is best positioned to advance it.

    In all, this seems like a neglected area with a lot of problems. That we rely on it for virtually all new drugs is scary. But investors like myself should eye the area with interest, especially given rich valuations in software startups.

    For more posts on biotech, check these out:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: The co-founders of BioNTech, a biotech success story. “Forschungszentrum der Biotech-Unternehmen BioNTech AG und Ganymed Pharmaceuticals AG” by MWKEL-RLP is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0

  • UBiome and Theranos Are So Similar It Will Shock You

    The co-founders of lab testing startup uBiome are under indictment for fraud and are currently on the run. Listening to a podcast about uBiome this morning, the parallels between it and Theranos struck me as uncanny:

    • The two co-founders were romantically involved, just as Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes was with COO Sunny Balwani. Perhaps its easier to keep secrets in the context of a romantic relationship?
    • Both companies surrounded themselves with high profile advisors with little scientific expertise. People like this create a halo of legitimacy but don’t have the background to ask the tough questions.
    • Unlike most Silicon Valley startups, it was in the hard sciences. It’s a lot harder for investors to verify the technology works than with an app they could download and play with themselves. And fewer investors have expertise in that area.

    There are some incredible tidbits in this podcast, including the fact that the photos used in patient testimonials were Shutterstock stock images. It occurs to me that savvy investors could do a Google reverse image search of any such photos from a company’s slide deck and find out if they’re doing the same. It would only take a few minutes. I think I’ll do the same in the future with startups that pitch me.

    Another important point is that this company went through the very prestigious accelerator Y Combinator. But accelerators don’t do deep due diligence. The checks they’re writing, usually in the $100,000 range, are too small to justify it. So don’t take that as an indication a company isn’t a fraud.

    For more on Theranos and startups in general, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: “LEWEB 2014 – CONFERENCE – LEWEB TRENDS – THE REINVENTION OF HEALTHCARE – JESSICA RICHMAN (UBIOME)” by LeWeb14 is licensed under CC BY 2.0

  • Almost Everyone Gets This Question Wrong

    I came across an interesting problem yesterday. It seems simple but almost everyone gets it wrong:

    You’re on a game show. The host shows you three doors. Behind one is a car. Behind the other two, nothing. Choose correctly and a brand new car is yours!

    You choose Door #1. The host opens Door #2 and shows you there’s nothing behind it. He then gives you a choice: stay with Door #1, or switch to Door #3.

    Which should you choose?

    What most people, including me, think at first is that it doesn’t matter. You could either switch or stay with Door #1. Either way you’d have a 50/50 shot.

    Most people are wrong. You actually have a 2/3rds chance of winning that awesome new car if you switch to Door #3!

    But how can that be? You’ve got two possibilities, so that’s 50/50 odds right? The key is that the game show host already opened Door #2.

    Before he did that, there was a 2/3rds chance that the car was behind either Door #2 or Door #3. After he opens Door #2 and shows you there’s nothing there, that’s still true. There is a 2/3rds chance it’s behind Door #2 or Door #3, except now Door #2 is eliminated. So there’s a 2/3rds chance that the shiny new car is behind Door #3, and you should switch.

    This is called the Monty Hall Problem, and if you got it wrong, you’re in good company. Mathematicians and even the brilliant professor who’s teaching the class I’m taking got it wrong at first.

    I find this problem fascinating because it shows us how wrong our intuitions can be, even in simple circumstances like these. If you’re interested in more puzzles like this, you can sign up for the Puzzles, Problems and Paradoxes class here. It’s online every Wednesday at 11:10am Central through UT-Austin. You’ll have missed the first of six classes, but believe me, it’ll still be worth your $108. The professor was one of my favorites from college and it’s a privilege to be able to learn again from this brilliant man!

    For more posts on philosophy and the mind, check these out:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

  • 7 Companies Had 3 Minutes Each to Pitch Us. This Is What Happened.

    I had the privilege of watching 7 excellent startups present at The Syndicate’s Remote Demo Day. All are seeking early stage funding for their company from the investment group, which I’m a part of.

    I came away from the meeting amazed at the quality of companies out there now. While I can’t share specifics about the companies (yet), here are a few things that struck me:

    • This was a pretty diverse group. It’s not all a white guy’s club anymore. I’m grateful because I don’t want to miss out on any good ideas! Diversity is on a lot of people’s minds right now, and I see things changing.
    • These are real companies. The public may think of startup funding as someone walking into a meeting with an idea and asking for money, but that’s not what it is. Every company had a real product in the market and many had millions in revenue. Some are even making a profit already. They need money to scale, not to start.
    • It’s not all software. One was a hardware solution for growing indoor gardens!
    • What the companies had in common: they were all focused on somehow making things easier, whether that’s working out with friends, growing food, etc.
    • Incredible growth rates. Many companies had year over year growth rates of 100%, 200%, even 500%.
    • Quality of companies is incredibly high. We have a lot of transformative innovation to look forward to very soon.
    • Many make opportunity available to anyone, whether that’s by monetizing your car or van, helping you pay for college, etc. This could be a real antidote to inequality.
    • My favorite company: a startup in the income sharing agreement area, which lets people sell a share in their future income to pay for school. This can replace expensive and hard to access loans. You only pay if you make a good living after graduation.

    Most are likely to be funded by our investment group, especially the software companies that act as a platform or marketplace. It’s a tried and true strategy that certainly worked for Uber and Airbnb, and that trend seems to be continuing.

    Congrats to all the amazing companies involved!

    For more on technology and startups, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: ““Great white shark” by Gussy (Luke) is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

  • Americans Are Using Their Stimulus Checks to Get Out of Debt

    Stimulus checks for $1,400 went out this month to most Americans. I found myself wondering today, did they save it, invest it, or just blow it?

    Data indicates that the biggest use of stimulus funds has been to pay down debt. A Census Bureau survey found 52% of people mostly used their checks to pay off debt, while only 28% mostly spent them.

    Repeated rounds of stimulus have left households with the lowest debt levels on record:

    Households finished 2020 with $14.1 trillion combined in checking and savings accounts, compared with $11.4 trillion in 2019, according to Federal Reserve data. Their debt-service burden—the percentage of after-tax income used to pay off debt—fell to its lowest level in records going back to the early 1980s.

    Nonetheless, the impact of stimulus funds on consumption has been notable. Bank of America found a huge spending spike among its customers:

    As the latest round of federal stimulus payments reached bank accounts, credit and debit card spending soared 45% overall last week on a year-over-year basis and 23% over two years, according to data aggregated by Bank of America.

    I strongly advise people with debt to pay it off before they do anything else. If you owe money on a loan at 10%, for example, when you pay it off, you are automatically guaranteed a 10% return on your investment! And that’s exactly what it is, an investment in your future.

    As someone who invests for a living, if I could get a guaranteed 10% return anywhere on earth, I’d be singing Hallelujah and dancing a jig. Take the easy win!

    For more on markets and finance, check out these posts:

    If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!

    Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too! 

    Photo: “Monopoly Guy Graffiti – Rich Uncle Pennybags” by Indrid__Cold is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0