Archegos Used Swaps to Hide Positions; Other Funds Are Too

Bill Hwang, founder of Archegos Capital Management, was charged yesterday with racketeering and securities fraud. How Hwang hid his positions teaches us a lot about how markets work today.

How Total Return Swaps Work

Archegos Capital Management controlled a majority of the shares of several large public companies without making any of the usually required disclosures. It was able to do this because it used a derivative called a total return swap.

A total return swap is pretty much like owning a stock. You get the gains if the stock goes up, you lose money if it goes down.

But you don’t technically own any shares.

Instead, you have a contract with a bank to get the gains and pay the bank for any losses. To hedge its risk, the bank will buy the shares, rather than you buying them.


Never miss a post…subscribe!


Hedge funds like Archegos love this arrangement because it lets them hide positions from the market and exempts them from disclosure requirements. Bankers love it because the swap comes with juicy fees.

These swaps even let you trade on huge margin. And they’re easy to get.

What’s a Few Felonies Between Friends?

Hwang had been convicted of fraud for actions at his prior fund, Tiger Asia. He was also banned from continuing to trade in Hong Kong, so he switched to US stocks.

But why let a few felony convictions get in the way of a great deal? Credit Suisse booked $16 million in fees from Archegos in 2020, likely leading to fat bonuses for the bankers involved.

How Hedge Funds Can Use Swaps to Hide Short Positions

Hwang used total return swaps to hide bets that stocks would go up. But they could just as easily be used to hide huge short positions.

If a hedge fund wanted to short a stock without anyone knowing how big their exposure is, a swap would be the natural choice. The fund could do numerous swaps with different banks, as Archegos did.

With the hedge fund’s bets split between various banks, no one would know how vulnerable the fund is to a short squeeze.

Had Melvin Capital been smart enough to do this last year, retail traders might never have known how exposed it was to GameStop Corp. shares. But they did know, and they used that knowledge to squeeze Melvin.

You can bet that other funds have learned from Melvin’s mistake.

What Investors Should Know

The bottom line is that it’s extremely easy for hedge funds to hide their positions today. It’s happening every day, and we only heard about Archegos because it blew up.

But you can be sure that other funds are out there hiding massive positions at this very moment.

What trades do you think hedge funds may be hiding? Leave a comment at the bottom and let me know!

More on markets:

Melvin Capital Faces Investor Revolt

Citadel Under Federal Investigation

FBI Raids Short Sellers

Never miss a post…subscribe!

If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/Reddit/etc. This helps more people find the blog! 

Save Money on Stuff I Use:

Fundrise

This platform lets me diversify my real estate investments so I’m not too exposed to any one market. I’ve invested since 2018 with great returns.

More on Fundrise in this post.

If you decide to invest in Fundrise, you can use this link to get $100 in free bonus shares!

Misfits Market

I’ve used Misfits for years, and it never disappoints! Every fruit and vegetable is organic, super fresh, and packed with flavor!

I wrote a detailed review of Misfits here.

Use this link to sign up and you’ll save $15 on your first order. 

11 thoughts on “Archegos Used Swaps to Hide Positions; Other Funds Are Too”

  1. The one asymmetric risk that has been mentioned many times without being named: The multitude of Gamestop shorts, held by many big players from 2019-2021, especially primer brokers and hedge funds never closed, they just got rolled into swaps that haven’t been reported.

    When the market crashes in the next few months, and the collective collateral of said funds has been massively reduced, they will no longer be able to meet their margins. Whether this happens before, after or during the share dividend, is another matter entirely. The results could be spectacular.

    Like

  2. In this scenario, the banks still hold the stocks. If the counter party busts, how does this leads to a squeeze? I would imagine, the banks would sell the stocks as soon the swap is not set anymore, leading to lower valuation. Additionally, a stock split would not change the contract fundamentally. Can you elaborate on this? Thanks

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Were a stock to go up a lot in that scenario, the bank would demand more collateral. If the hedge fund (or other counterparty) didn’t have it, I believe the bank would go after whatever other of the fund’s assets they could get.

      They’d also close the swap and cover the shares they shorted to hedge it, which could cause an increased share price.

      Like

  3. r/superstonk has been saying this for the past year +.
    The DOJ just needs to join the sub on reddit and they’d have all the info they need to arrest Ken Griffen, Steven Cohen, Gabe Plotkin, etc etc…

    Like

    1. There is def some very astute analysis there and also on r/amcstock, among others. As much as my fellow professional investors would like to scoff at the folks on Reddit, they have uncovered some real irregularities in my opinion.

      Like

  4. Rite Aid has been shorted way beyond its float by this kind of hedge fund chicanery. I hope a short squeeze comes along and demolishes the shorts.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s