In fact, given increasingly restrictive zoning, 54% of the homes in San Francisco could not be built today! The picture in New York City is similar, where 40% of Manhattan homes couldn’t be built under current zoning codes.
I find the anti-development discourse often focuses on “greedy developers” when a more appropriate person to focus on might be “working class mom who doesn’t want to live 90 minutes from work.” How we frame the problem may be the key to winning the argument. The “neighborhood character” trope is another NIMBY standby, but against a struggling single mom who spends four hours a day commuting on a bus to her job as a nanny and just wants an affordable place near her job, i think their argument loses its punch.
Housing in expensive cities like SF and NYC could get more affordable in a different, more painful way. Everyone I know of who lives in San Francisco is decrying staggering amounts of crime and school closures that have gone on over a year. The tech industry has moved to Zoom and found real efficiencies there. I live in the NYC area and can attest that crime has increased substantially.
Perhaps the way San Francisco and similar cities get cheaper isn’t by building, but by self-destruction.
For more on zoning and politics, check out these posts:
- Is Zoning Keeping Poor People Poor?
- From COVID Vaccines to Library Cards, Government is Failing Us. Here’s the Way Out.
- Europe Is Falling Behind the US, and It’s Going to Get Worse
If you found this post interesting, please share it on Twitter/LinkedIn/email using the buttons below. This helps more people find the blog! And please leave a comment at the bottom of the page letting me know what you think and what other information you’re interested in!
Check out the Stuff I Use page for some great deals on products and services I use to improve my health and productivity. They just might help you too!